|
||
|
|
Important : Citations of scientific journal references found in this web page, and on this website are for journalistic and educational purposes only, presented as a free exchange of ideas. They do not represent a recommendation, endorsement, diagnosis, nor prescription for any health disorder or remedy by the authors, or their publishers. Always consult your physician for recognized medical treatments. In the following "golden" study, people in 20 different locations of Italy were randomnly divided into two groups, patient and control. Neither the patient, nor the physician knew who was in which group. The patient group was given 1.2 grams of NAC (N-acetyl L-cysteine, an amino acid precursor to glutathione) every day. The control group was given placebos that looked and tasted the same as the NAC. Over the course of the subsequent flu season, physicians regularly screened blood samples for a particular flu virus that was known to be circulating in the population. While the number infected with the known flu virus was statistically the same between patients and controls, there was a very large difference between the groups in demonstrating flu symptoms. The group receiving the NAC had flu virus detected in 29% of patient blood. In the group recieving placebo, 24% had flu virus detected in their blood. There is no statistically significant difference between these two groups in the rate of virus infection. In the rate of developing flu symptoms, there was a very significant difference. In the control group 79% of the patients who had flu virus detected also had obvious flu symptoms. Only 25% of the group recieving the daily NAC showed any flu symptoms at all, when infected with the same flu. The strength of the immune response of the NAC group in putting down the flu infection was also significant when noting the severity and number of symptoms by those who developed them, when compared to controls who were also infected. The number of days in bed to recover from the flu were significantly different between the two groups too, with the NAC group spending much less time there. Glutathiones importance to proper immune function is now well established by many studies. The AIDS epidemic has provided much illumination to the essential nature of adequate glutathione for a competent immune response. The study reported here is clinical, multi-centered, prospective, double blind, with statistically significant sample sizes, and statistically significant differences in outcome between NAC and placebo. If one chooses to know nothing else, one has to conclude that supplementing NAC has a significant, positive effect on the ability of the human to resist flu symptoms. Including the other known facts about NAC as a Glutathione precursor, and sulfur bearing amino acid, this study demonstrates a very desirable clinical outcome from boosting glutathione through food supplements. Read on for the journal reference, followed by graphs we've created from the published results of this study. Title
For a strong immune system and resistance to the flu we suggest our Defense & Replenish and Glutathione Precursors products.
|