CFS Nutrition Logo  Beta Carotene-3

 


Glutathione Molecule
Return to:
  Science Index

- Nutrients
- Toxins & Conditions
Return to:
  Main Index
- Health Information
- Editorial
- Products
Place an Order:
  
Secure Server
CFS Nutrition Products:
   
Nutrition Programs

   Organ Cleansers
   Immune Stimulants
   Bottled Nutrients
   Probiotic Formulas
   Nutrition Books
   Water Filters
   Videos

Food Supplements:

Nutrition Books:
click here

Water Filters:

Science Index

Beta Carotene

Back
Next
Title
Antioxidant actions of beta-carotene in liposomal and microsomal membranes: role of carotenoid-membrane incorporation and alpha-tocopherol.
Author
Liebler DC; Stratton SP; Kaysen KL
Address
College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0207, USA.
Source
Arch Biochem Biophys, 338(2):244-50 1997 Feb 15
Abstract
beta-Carotene and other carotenoids are widely regarded as biological antioxidants. However, recent clinical trials indicate that beta-carotene supplements are not effective in disease prevention and raise questions about the biological significance of carotenoid antioxidant actions. To further explore this issue, we have reevaluated the antioxidant actions of beta-carotene in liposomal and biological membrane systems. In dilinoleoylphosphatidylcholine liposomes in which 0.35 mol % beta-carotene was incorporated into the bilayer during liposome preparation, the carotenoid inhibited lipid peroxidation initiated by 10 mm azobisÍamidinopropane HClÍ (AAPH). In carotenoid-free liposome suspensions to which the same amount of beta-carotene was added, no antioxidant effect was observed. Supplementation of rat liver microsomes with beta-carotene in vitro yielded microsomes containing 1.7 nmol beta-carotene mg-1 and 0.16 nmol alpha-tocopherol mg-1 microsomal protein. In beta-carotene supplemented microsomes incubated with 10 mm AAPH under an air atmosphere, lipid peroxidation did not occur until alpha-tocopherol was depleted by approximately 60%. beta-Carotene exerted no apparent antioxidant effect and was not significantly depleted in the incubations. Similar results were obtained when the incubation was done at 3.8 torr O2. In liver microsomes from Mongolian gerbils fed beta-carotene-supplemented diets, beta-carotene levels were 16-37% of alpha-tocopherol levels. The kinetics of AAPH-induced lipid peroxidation were no different in beta-carotene-supplemented microsomes than in microsomes from unsupplemented animals, although the kinetics of beta-carotene and alpha-tocopherol depletion were similar. The results indicate that beta-carotene is ineffective as an antioxidant when added to preformed lipid bilayer membranes and that alpha-tocopherol is a much more effective membrane antioxidant than beta-carotene, regardless of the method of carotenoid-membrane incorporation. These results support a reevaluation of the proposed antioxidant role for beta-carotene in biological membranes.

Title
Kinetics of parallel electron transfer from beta-carotene to phenoxyl radical and adduct formation between phenoxyl radical and beta-carotene.
Author
Mortensen A; Skibsted LH
Address
Department of Dairy and Food Science, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Source
Free Radic Res, 25(6):515-23 1996 Dec
Abstract
Phenoxyl radicals generated by laser flash photolysis were found to react with beta-carotene with concomitant beta-carotene bleaching in two parallel reactions with similar rates: (i) formation of a beta-carotene adduct with a (pseudo) first order rate constant of 1-1.5 x 10(4) s-1 with absorption maximum around 800 nm, and (ii) formation of a beta-carotene radical cation with a (pseudo) first order rate constant of 2-3 x 10(4) s-1 with absorption maximum around 920 nm. Both beta-carotene radicals decay on a similar time scale and have virtually disappeared after 100 ms, the beta-carotene adduct by a second order process. Oxygen had no effect on beta-carotene bleaching or radical formation and decay. The reduction of phenoxyl radicals by beta-carotene may prove important for an understanding of how beta-carotene acts as an antioxidant.

Title
Alpha-Tocopherol and beta-carotene supplements and lung cancer incidence in the alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene cancer prevention study: effects of base-line characteristics and study compliance [seecomments]
Author
Albanes D; Heinonen OP; Taylor PR; Virtamo J; Edwards BK; Rautalahti M; Hartman AM; Palmgren J; Freedman LS; Haapakoski J; Barrett MJ; Pietinen P; Malila N; Tala E; Liippo K; Salomaa ER; Tangrea JA; Teppo L; Askin FB; Taskinen E; Erozan Y; Greenwald P; Huttunen JK
Address
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-7326, USA.
Source
J Natl Cancer Inst, 88(21):1560-70 1996 Nov 6
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Experimental and epidemiologic investigations suggest that alpha-tocopherol (the most prevalent chemical form of vitamin E found in vegetable oils, seeds, grains, nuts, and other foods) and beta-carotene (a plant pigment and major precursor of vitamin A found in many yellow, orange, and dark-green, leafy vegetables and some fruit) might reduce the risk of cancer, particularly lung cancer. The initial findings of the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study (ATBC Study) indicated, however, that lung cancer incidence was increased among participants who received beta-carotene as a supplement. Similar results were recently reported by the Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET), which tested a combination of beta-carotene and vitamin A. PURPOSE: We examined the effects of alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene supplementation on the incidence of lung cancer across subgroups of participants in the ATBC Study defined by base-line characteristics (e.g., age, number of cigarettes smoked, dietary or serum vitamin status, and alcohol consumption), by study compliance, and in relation to clinical factors, such as disease stage and histologic type. Our primary purpose was to determine whether the pattern of intervention effects across subgroups could facilitate further interpretation of the main ATBC Study results and shed light on potential mechanisms of action and relevance to other populations. METHODS: A total of 29,133 men aged 50-69 years who smoked five or more cigarettes daily were randomly assigned to receive alpha-tocopherol (50 mg), beta-carotene (20 mg), alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene, or a placebo daily for 5-8 years (median, 6.1 years). Data regarding smoking and other risk factors for lung cancer and dietary factors were obtained at study entry, along with measurements of serum levels of alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene. Incident cases of lung cancer (n = 894) were identified through the Finnish Cancer Registry and death certificates. Each lung cancer diagnosis was independently confirmed, and histology or cytology was available for 94% of the cases. Intervention effects were evaluated by use of survival analysis and proportional hazards models. All P values were derived from two-sided statistical tests. RESULTS: No overall effect was observed for lung cancer from alpha-tocopherol supplementation (relative risk [RR] = 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87-1.13; P = .86, logrank test). beta-Carotene supplementation was associated with increased lung cancer risk (RR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.02-1.33; P = .02, logrank test). The beta-carotene effect appeared stronger, but not substantially different, in participants who smoked at least 20 cigarettes daily (RR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.07-1.46) compared with those who smoked five to 19 cigarettes daily (RR = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.76-1.23) and in those with a higher alcohol intake (> or = 11 g of ethanol/day [just under one drink per day]; RR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.01-1.81) compared with those with a lower intake (RR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.85-1.24). CONCLUSIONS: Supplementation with alpha-tocopherol or beta-carotene does not prevent lung cancer in older men who smoke. beta-Carotene supplementation at pharmacologic levels may modestly increase lung cancer incidence in cigarette smokers, and this effect may be associated with heavier smoking and higher alcohol intake. IMPLICATIONS: While the most direct way to reduce lung cancer risk is not to smoke tobacco, smokers should avoid high-dose beta-carotene supplementation.

Title
Risk factors for lung cancer and for intervention effects in CARET, the Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial [see comments]
Author
Omenn GS; Goodman GE; Thornquist MD; Balmes J; Cullen MR; Glass A; Keogh JP; Meyskens FL Jr; Valanis B; Williams JH Jr; Barnhart S; Cherniack MG; Brodkin CA; Hammar S
Address
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Source
J Natl Cancer Inst, 88(21):1550-9 1996 Nov 6
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evidence has accumulated from observational studies that people eating more fruits and vegetables, which are rich in beta-carotene (a violet to yellow plant pigment that acts as an antioxidant and can be converted to vitamin A by enzymes in the intestinal wall and liver) and retinol (an alcohol chemical form of vitamin A), and people having higher serum beta-carotene concentrations had lower rates of lung cancer. The Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial (CARET) tested the combination of 30 mg beta-carotene and 25,000 IU retinyl palmitate (vitamin A) taken daily against placebo in 18314 men and women at high risk of developing lung cancer. The CARET intervention was stopped 21 months early because of clear evidence of no benefit and substantial evidence of possible harm; there were 28% more lung cancers and 17% more deaths in the active intervention group (active = the daily combination of 30 mg beta-carotene and 25,000 IU retinyl palmitate). Promptly after the January 18, 1996, announcement that the CARET active intervention had been stopped, we published preliminary findings from CARET regarding cancer, heart disease, and total mortality. PURPOSE: We present for the first time results based on the pre-specified analytic method, details about risk factors for lung cancer, and analyses of subgroups and of factors that possibly influence response to the intervention. METHODS: CARET was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled chemoprevention trial, initiated with a pilot phase and then expanded 10-fold at six study centers. Cigarette smoking history and status and alcohol intake were assessed through participant self-report. Serum was collected from the participants at base line and periodically after randomization and was analyzed for beta-carotene concentration. An Endpoints Review Committee evaluated endpoint reports, including pathologic review of tissue specimens. The primary analysis is a stratified logrank test for intervention arm differences in lung cancer incidence, with weighting linearly to hypothesized full effect at 24 months after randomization. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated by use of Cox regression models; tests were performed for quantitative and qualitative interactions between the intervention and smoking status or alcohol intake. O'Brien-Fleming boundaries were used for stopping criteria at interim analyses. Statistical significance was set at the .05 alpha value, and all P values were derived from two-sided statistical tests. RESULTS: According to CARET's pre-specified analysis, there was an RR of 1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.73; P = .01) for weighted lung cancer incidence for the active intervention group compared with the placebo group, and RR = 1.59 (95% CI = 1.13-2.23; P = .01) for weighted lung cancer mortality. All subgroups, except former smokers, had a point estimate of RR of 1.10 or greater for lung cancer. There are suggestions of associations of the excess lung cancer incidence with the highest quartile of alcohol intake (RR = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.28-3.09; test for heterogeneity of RR among quartiles of alcohol intake has P = .01, unadjusted for multiple comparisons) and with large-cell histology (RR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.09-3.26; test for heterogeneity among histologic categories has P = .35), but not with base-line serum beta-carotene concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: CARET participants receiving the combination of beta-carotene and vitamin A had no chemopreventive benefit and had excess lung cancer incidence and mortality. The results are highly consistent with those found for beta-carotene in the Alpha-Tocopherol Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study in 29133 male smokers in Finland. IMPLICATIONS: Individuals at high risk of developing lung cancer, i.e., current smokers and asbestos-exposed workers, should be discouraged from taking supplemental beta-carotene (and the combination of beta-carotene with vitamin A). Safety and efficacy should be demonstrated befor

Title
The effect of orlistat, an inhibitor of dietary fat absorption, on the pharmacokinetics of beta-carotene in healthy volunteers.
Author
Zhi J; Melia AT; Koss-Twardy SG; Arora S; Patel IH
Address
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, New Jersey 07110-1199, USA.
Source
J Clin Pharmacol, 36(2):152-9 1996 Feb
Abstract
To assess the influence of orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, on the absorption of beta-carotene, an open-label, parallel, placebo-controlled, randomized, two-way crossover study was performed in 48 healthy volunteers between the ages of 19 and 58 years. Each subject received a single oral dose of 0, 30, 60, or 120 mg beta-carotene (12 subjects per dose level) on the fourth day of treatment with orlistat (120 mg) or placebo 3 times a day for 6 days. The treatments were separated by a washout period of at least 5 weeks. Serial blood samples were collected before and at appropriate intervals after administration of beta-carotene to determine plasma concentrations of unchanged beta-carotene. Short-term (3 to 6 days) treatment with orlistat did not alter endogenous profiles of beta-carotene in plasma. When beta-carotene was given during orlistat treatment, its absorption was reduced by approximately one-third. This reduction was consistent for all three dose levels of beta-carotene studied; however, the results for the 30-mg dose level were subject to greater variability, particularly for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). It was concluded that two thirds of a supplemental dose of beta-carotene will be absorbed during orlistat treatment; this may be sufficient to achieve physiologic levels of beta-carotene with an appropriate dose of beta-carotene, should supplementation be needed in obese patients who have developed beta-carotene deficiency during therapy with orlistat.

Title
In vitro beta-carotene toxicity for human colon cancer cells.
Author
Iftikhar S; Lietz H; Mobarhan S; Frommel TO
Address
Department of Medicine, Columbus Cabrini Hospital, Chicago, IL 60614,USA.
Source
Nutr Cancer, 25(3):221-30 1996
Abstract
Experiments were conducted to determine the effect of beta-carotene on human colon cancer cells in vitro. beta-Carotene solubilized in tetrahydrofuran (THF) was determined to be cytotoxic for three different cell lines: LS 180, SW 620, and HCT-15. The number of LS 180 and SW 620 cells surviving treatment with 2.9 microM beta-carotene was significantly reduced relative to THF-treated cells, and a similar reduction was achieved in HCT-15 cells with use of 5.8 microM beta-carotene. These concentrations are in the range achieved in serum of individuals supplemented with beta-carotene at 30 mg/day. There was no beta-carotene cytotoxicity in the concentration range that characterizes serum of unsupplemented individuals. Vitamin E at > 200 microM was not cytotoxic and at higher concentrations slightly stimulated proliferation of all three cell lines. Exposure of cells to vitamin E did not diminish the cytotoxicity of beta-carotene, suggesting that the toxic effect of beta-carotene is not due to prooxidant activity. Percent cytotoxicity was increased by extending the duration of exposure of cells to beta-carotene. Interestingly, beta-carotene cytotoxicity decreased with increasing cell density. This density-dependent toxicity was attributable to a higher beta-carotene concentration per cell for cells plated at lower densities. Thus toxicity of beta-carotene for colon cancer cells is dose, time, and cell density dependent and occurs in vitro at concentrations that can be achieved safely in humans.

Title
Gastric acidity influences the blood response to a beta-carotene dose in humans.
Author
Tang G; Serfaty-Lacrosniere C; Camilo ME; Russell RM
Address
Jean Mayer US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111. Tang_HP@HNRC.Tufts.edu
Source
Am J Clin Nutr, 64(4):622-6 1996 Oct
Abstract
The effect of gastric acidity on the blood response to a single dose of 120 mg beta-carotene in humans was investigated in 12 normal subjects (5 women, 7 men) aged 23-68 y. Omeprazole was used for 7 d to obliterate gastric acid secretion and to raise gastric pH to > 4.5. In a crossover design, six subjects were randomly assigned to take beta-carotene with omeprazole either at the beginning (day 9) or at the end (day 26) of the study. The beta-carotene response in blood was not altered by the experimental order. Results from the high-gastric-pH phase (ie, with omeprazole) were analyzed together and compared with the results from the low-gastric-pH phase (ie, without omeprazole). The increases of serum concentrations of both trans beta-carotene and cis beta-carotene 6 and 24 h after the beta-carotene dose were significantly greater at a low gastric pH (pH = 1.3 +/- 0.1, ie, without omeprazole) than those at a high gastric pH (pH = 6.4 +/- 0.3, ie, with omeprazole), P < 0.02. Similarly, 24 h after beta-carotene administration, the area under the blood beta-carotene response curve (trans plus cis beta-carotene) was significantly greater at a low gastric pH (6825 +/- 760 nmol.h/L) than at a high gastric pH (3390 +/- 550 nmol.h/L), P < 0.002. In investigations of bacterial overgrowth, gelatin capsule disintegration and isomeric profiles associated with high and low pH, we could not identify factors to explain the differences observed in the blood response curves between low-gastric-pH and high-gastric-pH conditions. A suppressed blood response of beta-carotene at a high intraluminal pH may have been due to the slower movement of negatively charged micelles through the unstirred water layer and cell membrane.

Title
The effect of supplemental beta-carotene on immunologic indices in patients with AIDS: a pilot study.
Author
Fryburg DA; Mark RJ; Griffith BP; Askenase PW; Patterson TF
Address
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Source
Yale J Biol Med, 68(1-2):19-23 1995 Jan-Apr
Abstract
Patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) are characterized by a decrease in the number of T helper cells, a defect that is linked to the impaired immunologic competence. Vitamin A and its dietary precursor, beta-carotene, increase absolute T helper cell counts as well as indices of T cell function in both human and animal models. To determine if short-term beta-carotene treatment affects T lymphocyte subsets in patients with AIDS, a single-blind, non-randomized clinical trial of beta-carotene was performed in seven patients with AIDS. Enrollment criteria included no evidence of: a) active opportunistic infection: b) greater than 1 kilogram change in weight in the month preceding enrollment; c) chronic diarrhea or malabsorption; and d) hepatic disease or significant anemia. Beta-carotene was given with meals in two divided doses of 60 mg/day for four weeks; this was followed by no therapy for six weeks. Samples for total white blood cell, lymphocyte and T lymphocyte subset counts were measured at baseline, at the end of four weeks of treatment and another six weeks after treatment had stopped. P24 antigen, beta-2 microglobulin and liver function tests were also measured. All subjects tolerated the treatment well without evidence of toxicity. In response to beta-carotene, total lymphocyte counts rose by 66 percent (.05 < p < .10), and CD4+ cells rose slightly, but insignificantly, in the entire group. In all three of the patients who had baseline CD4+ cells greater than 10/microliters, however, the mean absolute increase in CD4+ cells in response to beta-carotene was 53 +/- 10 cells/microliters (p < .01). Six weeks off beta-carotene treatment, the absolute CD4+ cell count returned to pretreatment levels (p < .01). No change was observed in CD8+ cells. P24 antigen and beta-2 microglobulin did not change during treatment. These preliminary observations suggest that short-term treatment with beta-carotene may increase CD4+ cell counts in patients with AIDS who have greater than 10 cells/microliters.

 

 Return to Main Page